<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morphy Richards Ecolectric Vacuum Cleaner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.envirogadget.com/home-gadgets/morphy-richards-ecolectric-vacuum-cleaner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.envirogadget.com/home-gadgets/morphy-richards-ecolectric-vacuum-cleaner/</link>
	<description>gadgets for the eco-warrior!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:44:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan (EnviroGadget Writer)</title>
		<link>http://www.envirogadget.com/home-gadgets/morphy-richards-ecolectric-vacuum-cleaner/comment-page-1/#comment-4599</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan (EnviroGadget Writer)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.envirogadget.com/?p=2847#comment-4599</guid>
		<description>I agree, but it does it make it &lt;strong&gt;more&lt;/strong&gt; efficient, which is still a good thing!

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, but it does it make it <strong>more</strong> efficient, which is still a good thing!</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hristo</title>
		<link>http://www.envirogadget.com/home-gadgets/morphy-richards-ecolectric-vacuum-cleaner/comment-page-1/#comment-4595</link>
		<dc:creator>Hristo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 03:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.envirogadget.com/?p=2847#comment-4595</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t want to be an ass because I like that web site very much,but I should point that because it uses 50% less energy doesn&#039;t actually make it efficient.The cleaner could have easily used only 100w, but then instead of being efficient it will clean nothing. Well you get the point, but I couldn&#039;t resist pointing that out.Keep up the good work you&#039;ve done so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to be an ass because I like that web site very much,but I should point that because it uses 50% less energy doesn&#8217;t actually make it efficient.The cleaner could have easily used only 100w, but then instead of being efficient it will clean nothing. Well you get the point, but I couldn&#8217;t resist pointing that out.Keep up the good work you&#8217;ve done so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

